Your Cutting-Edge dynamic linking Resource

LINKING ONLINE
Home Contact Us    
   

dynamic linking
Navigation

Dynamic Linking
List Linking

Resources

Marketing, Linking Without Spending Your Hard Earned Cash
By Steven Jones
Getting quality visitors to your website and getting them to trust in what you are selling must be the hardest challenge I believe on the internet. I know because in my first year of internet Read more...

create your own Adsense empire


 
Resources

Marketing, Linking Without Spending Your Hard Earned Cash
By Steven Jones
Getting quality visitors to your website and getting them to trust in what you are selling must be the hardest challenge I believe on the internet. I know because in my first year of internet Read more...
Resources

Cooperative Reciprocal Linking Networks - A Critical Analysis
By Philip Liu
Every webmaster who has personally tried promoting his or her site understands in some sense the value of reciprocal linking. Reciprocal linking refers to the agreement between website owners to Read more...
Resources

Deep Linking Strategy for Content Sites
By Jack Humphrey
Linking - what a mess if you don't know what's going on. Either linking is "IN" or it's "OUT" according to what you read these days.Here's the good news: Linking Read more...


Welcome to LINKING ONLINE - your comprehensive dynamic linking resource.

Below, you'll find extensive information on leading dynamic linking articles and products to help you on your way to success.

Cooperative Reciprocal Linking Networks - A Critical Analysis
By Philip Liu
Every webmaster who has personally tried promoting his or her site understands in some sense the value of reciprocal linking. Reciprocal refers to the agreement between website owners to mutually link to each others’ sites in order to increase both exposure to each others’ visitors as well as link popularity to search engines. Traditionally, this process has been very labor-intensive involving a number of steps to initiate contact, establish acceptable link parameters, and verify and police the reciprocal arrangement. Now, a controversial new tactic has emerged called “the cooperative reciprocal network.”

The purpose of these reciprocal networks is ostensibly to utilize "unused advertising space available on the web." Here's how it works: the site owner puts a bit of code on each page of his or her site and it serves up hyper-linked text or graphic ads promoting the sites of other cooperative members. Each time a coded page is loaded, the ads change. This is much like how Google Adsense ads work except there is no correlation between the pages’ topics and what ads are served--in other words, the ads are not contextual.

Although dynamically generated, these text ad links can be crawled by search engine spiders. In this sense, the ad network can be thought of as an automated method of reciprocal capable of providing a boost to each member site’s link popularity.

Participation in the reciprocal network is generally free (hence the term “cooperative”) and what one gets out of it depends on what one gives into it. If a webmaster agrees to display five ads per page and his or her site has 100 pages indexed by Google, then that webmaster’s site is given a weight of, say, 500 (5 x 100). The higher one’s "weight," the more often one’s ads will show on other sites in the network. In order to be an eligible page, the page has to be indexed. The reciprocal network checks this using Google's application program interface or API.

So what's the controversy? Reciprocal network critics contend that because the links are crawl-able by search engine robots and the fact that ads may be irrelevant to the page's topic area, this is akin to having some sort of reciprocal link farm or scheme designed to influence the web page’s link popularity and search engine ranking. Indeed, one well-known individual’s web page showed up for a while in Google

Special pickdynamic linking picks for

Mr. Robert Roger, the Designer and Editor
Robert Roger
Editor
 

at No. 4 for the term, "eBay" purely because he designed his link ads so that the anchor texts had the word "eBay" in them. Carried across thousands of reciprocal participants in the network, it had automated the reciprocal process and, at the same time, boosted his page’s link popularity for that particular term.

One would think that this is a bad thing from the search engines’ perspective, right? Not quite. GoogleGuy, the unofficial Google spokesman who regularly posts to website marketing forums, responded to a thread at one forum on this topic. GoogleGuy said he was concerned about out to "bad neighborhood" participants in the network (like some Polish site that was apparently cloaking the cooperative ads). GoogleGuy did not say that the network was bad because it had the potential of manipulating rankings, rather he said the worry was "bad neighborhoods." So, does that mean that if the bad neighborhood problem was under control then the reciprocal networks are sanctioned? Maybe...

Here's how I look at these cooperative reciprocal networks: what if Google didn't exist? What if no search engine existed? What would I do to advertise my site? I would have to participate in reciprocal with other sites. But reciprocal willy-nilly would not cut it; it would have to be targeted, topic-based reciprocal linking. I would link reciprocally with other like sites. Would I participate in reciprocal networks if there were no search engines? Absolutely! It would greatly ease my reciprocal time. But the reciprocal networks are untargeted as they are currently configured—-this is clearly something the operators need to address.

In conclusion, reciprocal via cooperative ad networks is a great idea. Google and the other search engines should not have any issues with them in concept. But concept is not reality; in reality, people are joining these networks and trading "weight" to influence link popularity and rankings in the search engines. So, it's not a perfect solution to the busy webmaster’s reciprocal link management problems. Is participating in a reciprocal link network spamming the search engines? I don't believe so because the search engines have not clearly defined exactly everything that is or isn't a spamming technique, and in this business, whether a technique constitutes spamming or not often comes down to a question of degree.
Philip Liu is a freelance author and publisher currently based in New York City. Philip publishes regularly on his websites, Cell Phone News + Reviews (focusing on cell phone news, rumors and reviews from around the world), and DTVScoop - Plasma, LCD TV Reviews + News (focusing on digital television news and reviews).

We strive to provide only quality articles, so if there is a specific topic related to linking that you would like us to cover, please contact us at any time.

And again, thank you to those contributing daily to our dynamic linking website.

Deep Linking Strategy for Content Sites
By Jack Humphrey
Linking - what a mess if you don't know what's going on. Either linking is "IN" or it's "OUT" according to what you read these days.Here's the good news: Linking Read more...

 

     

Search Ebooks and Software
Best Choice

Classifieds

HOW TO MAKE MONEY

 

banner for change the financial site of your life

Check Out Dave's Cool Little Website

Moon GRAFIX© 2006 - All Rights Reserved - Designed For dynamic linking.